Are Punitive Damages Awarded in California Personal Injury Cases?

personal injury | June 18, 2026

Punitive damages are available under California law, but not in every Roseville personal injury case. These damages are awarded in situations where the defendant’s conduct is especially serious or outrageous. Courts may allow punitive damages when a person or company’s actions go beyond simple carelessness or negligence. The wrongdoer must have acted with oppression, malice, or fraud. Compensatory damages are given to make the injured person “whole,” but punitive damages serve another purpose: 

  • To punish defendants for extremely harmful or despicable conduct.
  • To send a warning signal so others will not engage in the same actions.
  • To impose extra accountability, surpassing standard reimbursements for losses. 

Definition of Malice

Under California law, malice can refer to conduct that is specifically intended to cause injury to another person. However, it can also apply when someone engages in despicable conduct with a willful and conscious disregard for the rights or safety of others. In other words, the defendant does not always need to intend the specific injury that occurred. It may be enough to show that they knowingly engaged in extremely dangerous behavior and ignored the likely consequences.

Example: A driver who repeatedly chooses to drive while heavily intoxicated may not intend to injure anyone, but a court could find that the driver acted with conscious disregard for the safety of others. Similarly, a company that knowingly sells a dangerous product despite being aware of serious safety risks could potentially be found to have acted with malice.

Definition of Oppression 

Oppression refers to despicable conduct that subjects another person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person’s rights. It is not necessary to cause bodily harm, but about behavior that is particularly unfair, abusive, or exploitative. There must be proof that the defendant deliberately ignored the rights of another and subjected them to treatment which a reasonable person would consider to be reprehensible.

Example: A nursing home that intentionally ignores repeated reports of resident abuse or knowingly deprives vulnerable residents of necessary care could potentially be found to have acted with oppression. Another example might involve an employer who knowingly subjects a worker to dangerous conditions while ignoring complaints and safety concerns.

Definition of Fraud 

Fraud is a deliberate deception intended to cause harm. This may include lying, withholding vital information, or acting dishonestly to deceive another person. Unlike negligence, fraud requires proof that the defendant intentionally deceived someone or knowingly omitted information that they had an obligation to disclose.

Example: For example, a car manufacturer that intentionally conceals a harmful defect from consumers in order to continue selling cars could be liable for punitive damages based on fraud. Or a company that knowingly sells a product that is dangerous to public health and safety while making false statements about the product’s safety may be liable for fraudulent behavior.

Clear and Convincing Standard  

Plaintiffs seeking punitive damages face a higher burden of proof than the typical standard in most personal injury cases. They must prove malice, oppression, or fraud by clear and convincing evidence, rather than by a “preponderance of the evidence.” This means the proof has to be very compelling and convincing that the accused did what he is accused of doing.

This heightened standard reflects the fact that punitive damages are intended to punish particularly wrongful behavior rather than simply compensate an injured person for their losses. As a result, punitive damages are not awarded lightly and generally are not available in cases involving ordinary negligence, simple mistakes, or mere carelessness.

If you have any questions about potentially seeking punitive damages in your case, our Roseville wrongful death lawyer can help. Reach out today to schedule your free case evaluation